Work at policy level to broaden assessment
Summary
This strategy focuses on persuading the system leadership that the current narrow tests are a false economy, holding back progress by narrowing teachers� focus in a way that undermines learning. If the state standards reflect the NCTM Standards in any substantial way, the tests are also incompatible with the requirements of the NCLB Act, which requires state tests to be aligned with state standards.
The strategy has the potential to increase motivation for standards-based professional development, because it now has an obvious �test prep� pay-off. The "download extended report" gives a full description of this strategy including planning essentials, benefits and implementation pitfalls, and evaluative evidence.
The strategy has the potential to increase motivation for standards-based professional development, because it now has an obvious �test prep� pay-off. The "download extended report" gives a full description of this strategy including planning essentials, benefits and implementation pitfalls, and evaluative evidence.
Applicable tools
Standards-based assessment
that are now available such as:
Balanced Assessment in Mathematics: the tests
New Standards Mathematics Reference Examination
enable this strategy.
Balanced Assessment in Mathematics: the tests
New Standards Mathematics Reference Examination
enable this strategy.
Evidence on effectiveness of curricula
shows that a broad diet of mathematics is a more effective way to improve performance in mathematics than a narrower curriculum focused on item practice for state tests.
NCLB: the alignment case for broader tests
summarizes evidence on the (mis)match between state standards and state tests, how to check on your own state tests, and how to achieve alignment.